. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 9;31(6):1057–1066. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00345-1

Table 4.

Parameter estimates, standard error (SE) estimates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and factors for covariate of interest resulting from analyses of the urine dataset.

Pesticide	Method	Quantile	Estimate	SE	95% CI	Factor^a
Chlorpyrifos	Substitution		0.16	0.10	−0.03 – 0.35	1.18
(0.43^b)	MLE		0.16	0.09	−0.03 – 0.35	1.17
(0^c)	Quantile	25th	0.10	0.09	−0.09 – 0.29	1.10
		50th	0.09	0.08	−0.07 – 0.25	1.10
		75th	0.14	0.10	−0.06 – 0.33	1.14
Metolachlor	Substitution		0.39	0.23	−0.06 – 0.85	1.48
(37.45^b)	MLE		0.43	0.29	−0.14 – 1.01	1.54
(41.21^c)	Quantile^d	50th	0.49	0.36	−0.24 – 1.22	1.63
		75th	0.39	0.25	−0.11 – 0.88	1.47
Glyphosate	Substitution		−0.24	0.16	−0.55 – 0.07	0.79
(18.72^b)	MLE		−0.24	0.14	−0.52 – 0.04	0.79
(12.09^c)	Quantile	25th	−0.09	0.21	−0.52 – 0.34	0.92
		50th	−0.05	0.16	−0.37 – 0.28	0.95
		75th	−0.14	0.13	−0.39 – 0.12	0.87

Exponent of the estimate.

Censoring proportions for farm household.

Censoring proportions for non-farm household.

Result of 25th quantile level for metolachlor not presented because the censoring proportions (37.45% and 41.21%) are greater than 25%. Any quantile levels larger than or equal to 42th can be calculated (see the Figure 2).