Table 2.

Effects of aqueous garlic extract on serum glucose (mg/dL)

Groups	10 ${}^{\mathrm{th}}$ day	20 ${}^{\mathrm{th}}$ day	30 ${}^{\mathrm{th}}$ day	40 ${}^{\mathrm{th}}$ day
C	85 $\pm$ 8	86 $\pm$ 6	86 $\pm$ 6	89 $\pm$ 10
G	83 $\pm$ 3	84 $\pm$ 3	86 $\pm$ 3	90 $\pm$ 10
D1	558 $\pm$ 32 ${}^{a*,c*}$	541 $\pm$ 76 ${}^{a*,c€}$	521 $\pm$ 101 ${}^{a*,c€}$	485 $\pm$ 113 ${}^{a*,c€}$
D1 + G	545 $\pm$ 57 ${}^{a*}$	579 $\pm$ 37 ${}^{a*}$	495 $\pm$ 73 ${}^{a*}$	321 $\pm$ 27 ${}^{a*,b\Delta }$
D2	367 $\pm$ 102 ${}^{a*,b*}$	398 $\pm$ 156 ${}^{a*,b€}$	377 $\pm$ 183 ${}^{a*,b€}$	327 $\pm$ 140 ${}^{a*,b€}$
D2 + G	345 $\pm$ 19 ${}^{a*}$	302 $\pm$ 142 ${}^{a*}$	262 $\pm$ 134 ${}^{a\Delta }$	200 $\pm$ 74 ${}^{c€}$
Results presented as Mean $\pm$ SD. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p $<$ 0.05), C: Control rats, G: Rats that received aqueous garlic extract, D1: STZ-induced diabetic rats, D1 + G: STZ-induced diabetic rats treated with aqueous garlic extract, D2: STZ + nicotinamide-induced diabetic rats, D2 + G: STZ + nicotinamide-induced diabetic rats treated with aqueous garlic extract, ${}^a$ Compared with control rats, ${}^b$ Compared with D1, ${}^c$ Compared with D2. ${}^{*}$ P $<$ 0.01, ${}^{\Delta }$ P = 0.02, ${}^{€}$ P = 0.03