Table 3.
STERGM result: 2017 project-based conversation
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | (SE) | Est | (SE) | Est | (SE) | |
| Formation | ||||||
| Edges | −3.59 | (0.25)** | −3.57 | (0.30)*** | −5.63 | (0.99)*** |
| Mutual | 1.52 | (0.28)*** | 0.99 | (0.33)** | 0.96 | (0.33)** |
| Cyclicalities | −0.33 | (0.11)** | −0.35 | (0.11)*** | −0.31 | (0.11)** |
| Transitiveties | 1.04 | (0.21)*** | 1.00 | (0.21)*** | 0.90 | (0.22)*** |
| Team homophily | 1.03 | (0.30)*** | 1.06 | (0.30)*** | ||
| STG homophily | −0.20 | (0.20) | −0.19 | (0.20) | ||
| GEN homophily | 0.01 | (0.20) | −0.02 | (0.20) | ||
| DSC homophily | 0.54 | (0.21)* | 0.55 | (0.21)** | ||
| Openness | 0.30 | (0.13)* | ||||
| Support | 0.11 | (0.17) | ||||
| Persistence | ||||||
| Edges | −0.52 | (0.26)* | −0.81 | (0.41)* | −9.71 | (1.92)*** |
| Mutual | 0.62 | (0.49) | 0.07 | (0.56) | 0.40 | (0.61) |
| Cyclicalities | −0.59 | (0.19)** | −0.69 | (0.21)*** | −0.67 | (0.21)** |
| Transitiveties | 1.44 | (0.22)*** | 1.09 | (0.24)*** | 1.05 | (0.26)*** |
| Team homophily | 1.92 | (0.40)*** | 2.69 | (0.47)*** | ||
| STG homophily | 0.15 | (0.32) | 0.11 | (0.36) | ||
| GEN homophily | −0.48 | (0.32) | −0.41 | (0.36) | ||
| DSC homophily | 0.21 | (0.36) | 0.37 | (0.40) | ||
| Openness | 1.15 | (0.21)*** | ||||
| Support | 0.53 | (0.33) | ||||
DSC, discipline; GEN, gender; STERGM, separable temporal exponential random graph model; STG, stage.
***
p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Statistically significant terms are italicized.