Table 2.
Number (Percentage) of Responses for Each Item in Form B (n = 155).
| Item | Agree (%) | Neutral (%) | Disagree (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I/we managed to find out answers for all issues/points/questions from the 1st clinical reasoning session. | 132 (85%) | 20 (13%) | 3 (2%) |
| I found the method of clinical reasoning useful in gathering relevant patient information. | 143 (92%) | 12 (8%) | 0 (0%) |
| I found the method of clinical reasoning useful in processing/interpreting the patient information. | 147 (95%) | 8 (5%) | 0 (0%) |
| I found the method of clinical reasoning useful in identifying the medication-related problem(s). | 147 (95%) | 7 (4%) | 1 (1%) |
| I found the method of clinical reasoning useful in exploring therapeutic options for the identified problem(s). | 144 (93%) | 11 (7%) | 0 (0%) |
| I found the method of clinical reasoning useful in formulating a treatment plan for the patient. | 139 (90%) | 13 (8%) | 3 (2%) |
| Overall, the process was helpful in developing my clinical reasoning skill. | 146 (94%) | 8 (5%) | 1 (1%) |
| As compared to this clinical reasoning method, I would have learned more with any other method of assignment e.g. written case study, case study presentation, topic presentation, etc. | 14 (9%) | 41 (26%) | 100 (65%) |
| The method of clinical reasoning can help me take better clinical decisions in the future as a pharmacist. | 139 (90%) | 14 (9%) | 2 (1%) |