Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;5(5):BJGPO.2021.0058. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0058

Table 3. Summary of seven studies investigating GP judgment for the diagnosis of dementia.

Mannheim 44 Sydney 45 Hawaii 43 Antwerp 46 AgeCoDe 47 France 20 This study
Participant selection
Series C C C C  R  C C
Symptomatic No No a No No  No  Yes a Yes
Characteristics of participants
Number (index test) 3721 433 303 1003  3242  1453 240
Mean age (years) 76 85 75 75  80  81 80
% Female 70 84 63 63  66  71 47
% with dementia 29 25 9 2  2  50 55
Target condition and verification with reference standard
Verified n 407 105 303 101  22  385 240
Verified % 11 24 100 1  70  26 100
GP judgment (%)
Not impaired 36 76 33  94  48 14
Cognitive impairment 41  –  – 40
Dementia 23 19 33  6  26 36
Uncertain 5 33  –  22
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgment for dementia
Sensitivity 91 42 100  51  73 56
Specificity 76 89 100  96  58 89

C = consecutive. R = random; symptomatic: symptoms required for participation. % verified = number underwent reference test or number underwent index test. % with dementia = number with dementia or number verified.

a

Participants were not presenting with symptoms but GPs were asked to maximise the inclusion of people with suspected dementia that was not reported.