Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 12;60(45):24080–24088. doi: 10.1002/anie.202108997

Table 2.

c‐P64+ and c‐P66+ DLPNO‐CC/Def‐SVP/C relative energy values with respect to the corresponding lowest value.[a]

Species

Optimization

Geometry

ΔECCSD

ΔECCSD(T)

c‐P64+

B3LYP

min

0.0

0.0

CAM‐B3LYP

min

−5.2

7.8

M06‐2X

min

−1.8

5.5

c‐P66+

M06‐2X

min

0.0

0.0

B3LYP

min

81.9

68.4

CAM‐B3LYP

min

8.3

10.9

CAM‐B3LYP

TS

32.4

25.0

M06‐2X

TS

28.2

18.8

[a] All T1 diagnostic [38] values are below 0.017. DFT calculations employed the 6‐31G* basis set. Energy in kcal mol−1.