Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;26(10):1240–1247. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13646

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the use of B‐PEWS score stratified by clinical risk between the 1st and 2nd assessment period

Period 1 Period 2 p‐value
Low‐risk children
Total number, n 144 224
B‐PEWS difference, mean (SD) 6.7 (7.2) 1.0 (1.9) <0.001W
Wrong recommendations used because of incorrect score, n (%) 43 (29.3) 21 (9.5) <0.001C
No. of total score adequately calculated n (%) 13 (9.2) 84 (38.2) <0.001F
Adherence to ‘Assess/rescore’ in no., mean (SD) 8.6 (6.4) 13.4 (9.9) <0.001W
No. of best scenario, n (%) 1 (0.7) 25 (11.4) <0.001C
Moderate‐risk children
Total number, n 53 71
B‐PEWS difference, mean (SD) 9.8 (9.5) 3.0 (6.0) <0.001W
Wrong recommendations used because of incorrect score, n (%) 40 (83.3) 34 (51.5) <0.001C
No. of total score adequately calculated n (%) 1 (2.4) 8 (12.1) 0.149F
Adherence to ‘Assess/rescore’ in no., mean (SD) 14.6 (10.4) 21.9 (17.7) 0.014W
No. of best scenario, n (%) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.0) 0.508F
High‐risk children
Total number, n 2 5
B‐PEWS difference, mean (SD) 6.0 (5.9) 0.3 (1.9) 0.114W
Wrong recommendations used because of incorrect score, n (%) 3 (75.0) 3 (50.0) 0.571F
No. of total score adequately calculated, n (%) 4 (100) 4 (66.7) 0.467F
Adherence to ‘Assess/rescore’ in no., mean (SD) 26.0 (31.4) 7.0 (8.4) 0.067W
No. of best scenario, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; n, absolute frequency; %, relative per cent frequency; W, Mann–Whitney test; C, chi‐square test; F, Fisher exact test.