Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;129(5):e12800. doi: 10.1111/eos.12800

TABLE 4.

Summary of findings of the randomized controlled trials with quality of evidence assessment

Randomized controlled trials
Outcome Subjects, N (studies) RR or SMD (95% CI) Tit. event proportion Bio. risk (95% CI) Quality of evidence (GRADE)
Perioperative endpoints
Plate breakage a 482 (4) Four studies, of which two had zero events, one assessed plate breakage at plate level, and one at patient level
Screw breakage a 348 (4) Four studies, of which two had zero events, one assessed screw breakage at screw level, and one at patient level
Operation time b 266 (2) +0.50 (0.09; 0.91) NA NA Moderate c
Handling by surgeon b 260 (2) Two studies, different outcome measures
Short‐term follow‐up
Malocclusion a No studies
Infection a 645 (8) 1.03 (0.46; 2.28) 43 per 1000 45 per 1000 (20; 98) Moderate f
Swelling a 255 (2) 1.51 (0.68; 3.38) 133 per 1000 201 per 1000 (91; 450) Very low c , d , f
Abscess a 200 (1) Single study
Pain a 160 (3) Three studies, two with different outcome measures and one provided data in graphs only
Analgesics used a No studies
MMO b 66 (1) Single study that provided data in graphs only
Dehiscence a 421 (5) 1.53 (0.52; 4.50) 24 per 1000 37 per 1000 (13; 108) Moderate f
Plate exposure a 182 (4) Four studies, of which two had zero events and one did not provide sufficient details
Intermediate follow‐up
Malunion a 240 (2) Two studies, of which one had zero events
Mobility bone segments a 115 (2) 1.37 (0.47; 3.99) 104 per 1000 143 per 1000 (49; 415) Moderate f
Malocclusion a 200 (1) Single study
Pain b 260 (2) −0.01 (−0.26; 0.24) NA NA Moderate c
MMO b 66 (1) Single study that provided data in graphs only
TMJ‐dysfunction a 22 (1) Single zero‐event study
Long‐term follow‐up
Malocclusion a 217 (3) 0.93 (0.39; 2.26) 113 per 1000 105 per 1000 (44; 256) Moderate f
Pain b 220 (3) −0.02 (−0.29; 0.25) NA NA High
MMO b 141 (2) −0.58 (−1.39; 0.22) NA NA Very low c , e , f
TMJ‐dysfunction a 40 (1) Single study
MFIQ b 203 (1) Single study
Abscess a 203 (1) Single study
Swelling a 178 (2) 2.42 (0.52; 11.19) 20 per 1000 49 per 1000 (11; 224) Moderate c , f , g
Palpability plate/screws a 400 (4) 0.38 (0.11; 1.28) 232 per 1000 89 per 1000 (26; 297) Very low c , d , f
Satisfaction b 329 (3) Three studies, different outcome measures
Overall follow‐up
Symptomatic device removal a 777 (7) 1.29 (0.68; 2.44) 83 per 1000 107 per 1000 (57; 203) Moderate4
Total costs b 203 (1) Single study
Revision surgery (not device removal) a 377 (4) 1.40 (0.37; 5.34) 20 per 1000 28 per 1000 (8; 107) Moderate4
Maxillary horizontal relapse (adv) 160 (3) Three studies, of which one provided data in graphs only and one could not be included in the meta‐analysis due to zero variance in the titanium group
Maxillary angular relapse (adv) 100 (2) Two studies, significant different reference points used for assessment
Maxillary horizontal relapse (sb) No studies
Maxillary angle relapse (sb) No studies
Maxillary vertical relapse (imp) 95 (2) +0.07 (−0.35; 0.50) NA NA High
Maxillary vertical relapse (elong) 60 (1) Single study
Mandibular horizontal relapse (adv) 80 (2) Two studies, of which one provided data in median with interquartile range and one provided insufficient details
Mandibular horizontal relapse (sb) 80 (2) +0.04 (−0.73; 0.80) NA NA Low d , f
Mandibular vertical relapse (adv) 80 (2) Two studies, of which one provided data in median with interquartile range and one provided insufficient details
Mandibular vertical relapse (sb) 80 (2) −0.63 (−1.11; −0.15) NA NA Low d , f
Mandibular angular relapse (CW) 22 (1) Single study
Mandibular angular relapse (CCW) 80 (2) 1.12 (0.08; 2.16) NA NA Very low d , e , f

Abbreviations: adv, advancement; Bio, biodegradable osteosynthesis; CCW, counter clockwise rotation; CW, clockwise rotation; elong, elongation; GRADE, Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group system; NA, not applicable; RR, risk ratio (binary variables); sb, setback; imp, impaction; SMD, standardized mean difference (continuous variables); Tit, titanium osteosynthesis.

a

Binary variable.

b

Continuous variable.

c

Downgraded one level due to high risks of bias identified across studies: majority of studies had high risk of bias.

d

Downgraded one level for inconsistency: substantial methodological or clinical heterogeneity that could not be accounted for in analyses.

e

Downgraded one level for indirectness: the evidence of the original manuscripts were more restrictive than the review question.

f

Downgraded one level for imprecision: limits of effect estimate confidence interval are not consistent (i.e., cover both benefit and harm).

g

Upgraded one level due to large effect (i.e., RR < 0.5 or RR > 2.0, or SMD < −0.8 or SMD > +0.8).