TABLE 2.

Comparison of pg‐gan and fastsimcoal

	$N_1$	$N_2$	$N_{\mathrm{anc}}$	$T_{\mathrm{split}}$	mig	reco
TRUE	9,000	5,000	15,000	2,000	0.050	1.25e−08
pg‐gan	9,563	5,719	14,406	2,321	0.056	1.40e−08
fastsimcoal	8,455	4,864	15,395	1,887	0.028	–

Inferred parameters for the IM model (see Figure 3a). pg‐gan results correspond to Figures 4,5, and fastsimcoal results correspond to Figure 6. For fastsimcoal, recombination rate is not shown, since it cannot be inferred from the SFS.