Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 17;21:450. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02484-2

Table 4.

Barriers to assessment in adults with non-progressive dysarthria

Barriers to effective assessment Examples of responses n %
Lack of available standardized Arabic assessment tools

• Absence of tools adapted to the Lebanese population.

• We don’t have a reliable and valid assessment tool in the Arabic language to assess all areas needed (phonation, prosody, respiration...)

34 68
Comorbidities

• The variability in the characteristics of dysarthria along with comorbidities in patients makes it hard to assess effectively.

• The presence of comorbidities and especially in cases of dysphagia.

• Mostly, the receptive level of the patient influences the assessment process.

11 22
Financial problems

• Financial barriers to providing specialized instrumental assessment tools.

• I am unable to purchase standardized English assessments for my bilingual patients due to the current dollar rate crisis.

10 20
Professional limitations

• Perceptual judgments are subjective as the accuracy of the assessment finding depends on the clinician’s expertise in active listening and analyzing the characteristics of speech.

• I receive a limited number of patients with dysarthria per year, so, I believe I need more practice.

5 10
Client motivation and compliance • The low motivation of the patient as the assessment tasks might seem boring. 5 10