Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;13(11):1216–1226. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12556

Table 1.

Questions and instructions sent to participants for each round of the Delphi study

First round
1. What treatments would you propose for the management of PLP in people with limb amputations?
Second Round
1. Would you say these treatment approaches are effective for reducing PLP in people with amputations? Please indicate your response by selecting one number on a scale of 1‐5.
1 = Strongly agree 2 = Agree 3 = No opinion 4 = Disagree 5 = Strongly disagree
2. Please select from the provided list a rationale that best reflects your viewpoint for endorsing or rejecting each treatment.
There is some scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of the treatment The treatment is effective in clinical practice There is some scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of the treatment and the treatment is effective in clinical practice There is a lack of scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of the treatment The treatment is not effective in clinical practice
Third Round
1. Here are the results of the second round of the Delphi. Considering the groupʼs opinion, please review (if necessary) your ratings from the second round.

PLP = phantom limb pain.