Table 4.
Comparison analysis of existing with proposed method
References | Method | Accuracy | Specificity | Sensitivity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Blagus R et al (2013) [9] | Multi branch neural network | 91.51% | 90.90% | 92.33% |
Mojab N et al (2019) [10] | Deep CNN | 79.04% | 88.95% | 79.04% |
Bajwa M N et al (2019) [11] | Two-stage framework RCNN | 95.45% | 93.45% | 96.43% |
Burlina P et al (2016) [12] | SVM Classifier | 95.00% | 95.60% | 96.40% |
Tan J H et al (2018) [19] | Deep CNN | 93.45% | 96.43% | 79.04% |
Chai et al (2018) [18] | RCNN | 91.51% | 90.90% | 92.33% |
Our proposed model | CNN with SoftMax | 93.80% | 100.00% | 85.40% |
CNN with SVM | 95.60% | 100.00% | 89.50% |