Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 1;58(5):705–715. doi: 10.1002/uog.23615

Table 3.

Performance of umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) ≥ 90th percentile or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 10th percentile at inclusion, in the prediction of composite adverse perinatal outcome in 856 pregnancies at risk of late‐onset preterm fetal growth restriction, using different published reference charts

Study Ratio assessed TPR* FPR Specificity (%) Crude OR (95% CI)
Arduini (1990) 19 UCR 18/64 (28) 75/792 (9) 90 3.7 (2.1–6.8)
Baschat (2003) 20 CPR 51/270 (19) 42/586 (7) 93 3.0 (1.9–4.7)
Ebbing (2007) 21 CPR 60/404 (15) 33/452 (7) 93 2.2 (1.4–3.5)
Morales‐Rosello (2015) 22 CPR 39/184 (21) 54/672 (8) 92 3.1 (2.0–4.8)
Srikumar (2017) 26 CPR 58/377 (15) 35/479 (7) 93 2.3 (1.5–3.6)
Ciobanu (2019) 23 CPR 49/252 (19) 44/604 (7) 93 3.1 (2.0–4.8)
Dias (2019) 27 CPR 39/161 (24) 54/695 (8) 92 3.8 (2.4–6.0)
Flatley (2019) 25 CPR 50/263 (19) 43/593 (7) 93 3.0 (1.9–4.6)
Zohav (2019) 28 CPR 22/84 (26) 71/772 (9) 91 3.5 (2.0–6.0)
Acharya (2020) 24 CPR 53/339 (16) 40/517 (8) 92 2.2 (1.4–3.4)

Only first author's name is given for each study.

Data are given as n/N (%), unless indicated otherwise.

*

True‐positive rate (TPR) is equal to sensitivity.

Specificity is equal to 100 − false‐positive rate (FPR).

OR, odds ratio.