Table 3.
Study | Ratio assessed | TPR* | FPR | Specificity (%)† | Crude OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arduini (1990) 19 | UCR | 18/64 (28) | 75/792 (9) | 90 | 3.7 (2.1–6.8) |
Baschat (2003) 20 | CPR | 51/270 (19) | 42/586 (7) | 93 | 3.0 (1.9–4.7) |
Ebbing (2007) 21 | CPR | 60/404 (15) | 33/452 (7) | 93 | 2.2 (1.4–3.5) |
Morales‐Rosello (2015) 22 | CPR | 39/184 (21) | 54/672 (8) | 92 | 3.1 (2.0–4.8) |
Srikumar (2017) 26 | CPR | 58/377 (15) | 35/479 (7) | 93 | 2.3 (1.5–3.6) |
Ciobanu (2019) 23 | CPR | 49/252 (19) | 44/604 (7) | 93 | 3.1 (2.0–4.8) |
Dias (2019) 27 | CPR | 39/161 (24) | 54/695 (8) | 92 | 3.8 (2.4–6.0) |
Flatley (2019) 25 | CPR | 50/263 (19) | 43/593 (7) | 93 | 3.0 (1.9–4.6) |
Zohav (2019) 28 | CPR | 22/84 (26) | 71/772 (9) | 91 | 3.5 (2.0–6.0) |
Acharya (2020) 24 | CPR | 53/339 (16) | 40/517 (8) | 92 | 2.2 (1.4–3.4) |
Only first author's name is given for each study.
Data are given as n/N (%), unless indicated otherwise.
True‐positive rate (TPR) is equal to sensitivity.
Specificity is equal to 100 − false‐positive rate (FPR).
OR, odds ratio.