Table 4.
Study | Ratio assessed | aOR (95% CI) | AUC (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Arduini (1990) 19 | UCR | 2.7 (1.4–5.1) | 0.73 (0.67–0.78) |
Baschat (2003) 20 | CPR | 2.2 (1.4–3.5) | 0.73 (0.67–0.78) |
Ebbing (2007) 21 | CPR | 1.7 (1.1–2.7) | 0.71 (0.65–0.77) |
Morales‐Rosello (2015) 22 | CPR | 2.3 (1.4–3.8) | 0.72 (0.66–0.78) |
Srikumar (2017) 26 | CPR | 1.7 (1.0–2.7) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Ciobanu (2019) 23 | CPR | 2.2 (1.4–3.6) | 0.72 (0.66–0.78) |
Dias (2019) 27 | CPR | 2.6 (1.6–4.3) | 0.73 (0.67–0.78) |
Flatley (2019) 25 | CPR | 2.2 (1.4–3.5) | 0.72 (0.66–0.78) |
Zohav (2019) 28 | CPR | 2.4 (1.3–4.4) | 0.73 (0.67–0.78) |
Acharya (2020) 24 | CPR | 1.7 (1.0–2.6) | 0.71 (0.65–0.77) |
Adjustment parameters | |||
GA (in weeks) | — | 0.8 (0.7–1.0) | — |
EFW MoM | — | 0.6 (0.4–0.7) | — |
Pre‐eclampsia | — | 2.1 (1.2–3.7) | — |
Only first author's name is given for each study.
At a sensitivity of 70%, specificity was approximately 60% for all models.
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; AUC, area under receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve.