Table 5.
Study | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | AUC (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|
UCR MoM | CPR MoM | ||
Arduini (1990) 19 | 1.74 (1.04–2.90) | 0.45 (0.21–0.98) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Baschat (2003) 20 | 1.58 (1.04–2.41) | 0.38 (0.15–0.97) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Ebbing (2007) 21 | 1.51 (1.03–2.22) | 0.34 (0.12–0.96) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Morales‐Rosello (2015) 22 | 1.62 (1.04–2.52) | 0.39 (0.16–0.97) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Srikumar (2017) 26 | 1.60 (1.04–2.47) | 0.38 (0.15–0.97) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Ciobanu (2019) 23 | 1.63 (1.04–2.56) | 0.40 (0.16–0.97) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Dias (2019) 27 | 1.46 (1.02–2.09) | 0.33 (0.11–0.90) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Flatley (2019) 25 | 1.59 (1.04–2.45) | 0.38 (0.15–0.97) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Zohav (2019) 28 | 1.60 (1.04–2.47) | 0.38 (0.15–0.95) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Acharya (2020) 24 | 1.53 (1.03–2.26) | 0.35 (0.13–0.96) | 0.71 (0.66–0.77) |
Adjustment parameters | |||
GA (in weeks) | 0.86 (0.73–0.99) | — | |
EFW MoM | 0.54 (0.41–0.71) | — | |
Pre‐eclampsia | 2.27 (1.33–3.86) | — |
Only first author's name is given for each study.
At a sensitivity of 70%, specificity was approximately 60% for all models.
For assessment of CPR, the UCR charts of Arduini and Rizzo 19 were transformed (1/UCR); all other charts were for CPR and were transformed (1/CPR) for assessment of UCR.
AUC, area under receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve; OR, odds ratio.