. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2021 Dec 1;42(10 Suppl):S33–S41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003377

Table 3.

Results of Spearman’s rank-order correlations among cognitive-linguistic composite score and speech recognition measures for each subgroup: Low-SMRT, Intermediate-SMRT, and High-SMRT; Spearman’s rho and p value are bolded where p < .05

		Group
Speech Measure		Low-SMRT (N = 16)	Intermediate-SMRT (N = 17)	High-SMRT (N = 18)
CID Words (% correct)	Spearman’s rho	.28	−.10	−.58
CID Words (% correct)	p	.15	.35	.007
Harvard Sentences (% words)	Spearman’s rho	.26	−.44	−.45
Harvard Sentences (% words)	p	.17	.04	.03
PRESTO Sentences (% key words)	Spearman’s rho	.39	−.46	−.50
PRESTO Sentences (% key words)	p	.07	.04	.02