Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2021 Dec 1;42(10 Suppl):S33–S41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003377

Table 4.

Results of Spearman’s rank-order correlations among cognitive-linguistic measures, divided by SMRT subgroup; Spearman’s rho and p value are bolded where p < .05

Top-down Cognitive-Linguistic Measure
Speech Measure Working Memory (score) Average Inhibition-Concentration (msec) Speed of Lexical Access (% correct) Nonverbal Reasoning (score)
LOW-SMRT GROUP
CID Words (% correct) Spearman’s rho −.18 .31 −.08 .52
p .25 .12 .39 .02
Harvard Sentences (% words) Spearman’s rho .11 .27 −.23 .30
p .34 .16 .20 .13
PRESTO Sentences (% key words) Spearman’s rho −.07 .40 −.31 .26
p .40 .06 .12 .17
INTERMEDIATE-SMRT GROUP
CID Words (% correct) Spearman’s rho .19 .09 .48 .33
p .23 .36 .03 .10
Harvard Sentences (% words) Spearman’s rho .44 −.35 .35 .44
p .05 .09 .09 .05
PRESTO Sentences (% key words) Spearman’s rho .49 −.40 .30 .35
p .03 .07 .13 .09
HIGH-SMRT GROUP
CID Words (% correct) Spearman’s rho −.01 −.49 .42 .42
p .49 .02 .05 .05
Harvard Sentences (% words) Spearman’s rho −.05 −.47 .48 .22
p .42 .03 .02 .19
PRESTO Sentences (% key words) Spearman’s rho −.03 −.35 .37 .52
p .46 .08 .07 .01