Table 5. Ratings of SBA and 5:2 interventions at week 6.
SBA | 5:2SH | 5:2G | SBAvs. 5:2SH * | 5:2G vs. 5:2SH * | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
median (IQR) | median (IQR) | median (IQR) | |||
How helpful did you find the intervention? | 7 (4–8) | 8 (5–9) | 10 (7–10) | Z = -1.6 p = 0.12 | Z = -4.3 p<0.001 |
(N = 75) | (N = 85) | (N = 85) | |||
How likely is it that you will recommend it to others | 8 (5–10) | 9 (7–10) | 10 (9–10) | Z = -2.4 p = 0.02 | Z = -3.7 p<0.001 |
(N = 77) | (N = 87) | (N = 85) | |||
Difficulty adhering to advice | 5 (3–7) | 5 (1–7) | 3 (2–5) | Z = 1.3 p = 0.20 | Z = 1.1 p = 0.28 |
(N = 73) | (N = 77) | (N = 82) | |||
Readiness to continue | 8 (7–10) | 10 (8–10) | 10 (8–10) | Z = -3.3 p = 0.001 | Z = 0.8 p = 0.43 |
(N = 76) | (N = 77) | (N = 82) |
* Wilcoxon rank sum test.