Table 5.
Comparison of oncologic results of Portsmouth series with published data
| Comparison with other series | Patients (n) | Type of surgery | Type of approach | Mean FUP (Years) | DFS (%) | OS (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portsmouth series | 77 | Right colectomy | Robotic | 3 | 94% | 94% |
| Spinoglio et al. [32] | 100 | Right colectomy | Robotic | 4 | 91.40% | 90.3 |
| Cho et al. [33] | 773 | Right colectomy | Open and MIS | 5 |
Open 82.9 MIS 82.8 |
Open 89.8 MIS 84 |
| Bertelsen et al. [18] | 364 | Colectomy | Open and lap | 4 | 85.8 | 74.9 |
| Shin et al. [34] | 168 | Colectomy | Lap | 4.8 | 88.3 | 89.6 |
| Hohenberger et al. [8] | 1329 | Colectomy | Open | 5 | 89.1 | |
| Bokey et al. [20] | 779 | Colectomy | Open and lap | 5 | 89.8 | 76.2 |
CME complete mesocolic excision, MIS minimally invasive surgery, Lap laparoscopic, FUP follow-up time, DFS disease-free survival, DSS disease-specific survival, OS overall survival