Table 2.
Intercept | Linear Change | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient | SE | t | p | Coefficient | SE | t | p | |
Individual Model: Teens’ Empathic Support (H1–2) | ||||||||
Unconditional growth curve model | 2.27 | .05 | 47.95 | <.001 | .04 | .03 | 1.07 | .284 |
Conditional growth curve model | ||||||||
Family income | .07 | .03 | 2.19 | .028 | −.02 | .02 | −.74 | .459 |
Gender | .21 | .09 | 2.40 | .016 | −.06 | .07 | −.98 | .326 |
Attachment security (14y) | .58 | .11 | 5.35 | <.001 | −.19 | .08 | −2.38 | .018 |
Dyadic Model: Friends’ Support-Seeking & Teens’ Empathic Support Provision (H3) | ||||||||
Unconditional dyadic growth curve model | ||||||||
Friends’ support-seeking | 1.68 | .06 | 29.19 | <.001 | .01 | .03 | 0.14 | .890 |
Teens’ empathic support provision | 2.27 | .05 | 48.04 | <.001 | .04 | .03 | 1.12 | .262 |
Conditional dyadic growth curve model | ||||||||
Family income → Friends’ support-seeking | .08 | .04 | 2.17 | .030 | .01 | .02 | .44 | .657 |
Family income → Teens’ empathic support | .07 | .03 | 2.19 | .028 | −.02 | .02 | −.77 | .439 |
Gender → Friends’ support-seeking | .34 | .11 | 3.13 | .002 | −.07 | .07 | −.96 | .339 |
Gender → Teens’ empathic support | .23 | .09 | 2.53 | .011 | −.07 | .07 | −1.03 | .302 |
Attachment security (14y) → Friends’ support-seeking | .54 | .14 | 3.98 | <.001 | −.25 | .09 | −2.90 | .004 |
Attachment security (14y) → Teens’ empathic support | .56 | .11 | 5.17 | <.001 | −.18 | .08 | −2.25 | .025 |
Note. The unstandardized coefficients represent the regressions of the intercepts and slopes for teen empathic support provision (a composite of emotional support, instrumental support, engagement, and interpretation of the problem) and friend support-seeking (a composite of emotional and instrumental support-seeking) on the predictors (e.g., attachment security). Boldface indicates significant coefficients, p < .05.