Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 17;11:22391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01872-5

Table 2.

Field metabolic rates of 5 female giant pandas measured with DLW at different locations during different seasons.

Studbook number Panda age Season Location Mass (kg) Ambient temperature (°C) FMR CO2 ml/g/h FMR O2 ml/g/h FMR KJ/day Predicted FMR KJ/day
1000 2.4 Autumn Panda Valley 58.1 14.0 0.22 0.25 7143 15,133.9
1000 3.5 Winter Daxiangling 68.9  − 2.4 0.74 0.82 28,045 17,151.4
881 5.0 Summer Daxiangling 102.4 18.2 0.34 0.38 19,417 22,940.7
881 6.0 Winter Daxiangling 100.1  − 2.4 0.80 0.89 44,170 22,561.4
853 7.3 Autumn Panda base 95.4 14.9 0.45 0.50 23,592 21,778.9
1008 3.4 Winter Panda base 93.6 12.1 0.24 0.27 12,435 21,476.5
1073 2.2 Winter Panda base 77.1 8.8 0.15 0.17 6521 18,627.1

Pandas 881 and 853 are adults. The others are sub-adults. The FMR was calculated using an RQ of 0.9. The body mass vs. FMR equation of Nagy39 was used to predict FMR of a studied giant panda. The values for FMR (KJ/day) in this table differ from those in Bi (2020)55 (see Supplementary Information).