Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;76(3):653–658. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa499

Table 1.

Patient characteristics in cases of Elizabethkingia spp. infection

E. anophelis E. meningoseptica E. miricola clusterb
Total (n) 90 7 11
Age, years, n (%)a
 <18 1 (1.1) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 18–64 20 (22.2) 1 (14.3) 2 (18.2)
 ≥65 65 (72.2) 6 (85.7) 9 (81.8)
Hospital type, n (%)
 Medical centres 63 (70) 4 (57.1) 5 (45.5)
 Regional hospitals 27 (30) 3 (42.9) 6 (54.5)
Region of hospitals, n (%)
 North 42 (46.7) 3 (42.9) 7 (63.6)
 Central 22 (24.4) 2 (28.6) 1 (9.1)
 South 20 (22.2) 2 (28.6) 3 (27.3)
 East 6 (6.7) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Patient location, n (%)a
 ICU 44 (48.9) 4 (57.1) 8 (72.7)
 Non-ICU ward 39 (43.3) 1 (14.3) 1 (9.1)
 OPD/ER 4 (4.4) 0 (0) 2 (18.2)
Specimen type, n (%)
 Respiratory 46 (51.1) 3 (42.9) 3 (27.3)
 Blood 41 (45.6) 3 (42.9) 8 (72.7)
 Pus/discharge 1 (1.1) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Urine 1 (1.1) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Other 1 (1.1) 1 (14.3) 0 (0)

OPD, outpatient department; ER, emergency room.

a

Not all age and hospital location data were available.

b

E. miricola cluster comprised E. miricola (6), E. bruuniana (3) and E. ursingii (2); no E. occulta isolates were identified.