Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;27(7):1008–1016. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa269

TABLE 2.

Performances of Fecal Calprotectin to Detect Endoscopic Ulcerations According to Crohn’s Disease Location (Ileal vs Colonic or Ileocolonic)

No. patients Cutoff value AUC Se Spe PPV NPV Accuracy
Ileal CD 40 200 µg/g 0.81 (0.68–0.94) 75.0% (47.6–92.7) 87.5% (67.6–97.3) 80.0% (51.9–95.7) 80.8% (63.9–95.5) 82.5%
Ileal CD 40 250 µg/g 0.78 (0.64–0.92) 68.8% (41.3–89.0) 87.5% (67.6–97.3) 78.6% (49.2–95.3) 80.8% (60.6–93.4) 80.0%
Colonic or ileocolonic CD 83 250 µg/g 0.79 (0.70–0.88) 84.1% (69.9–93.4) 74.4% (57.9–87.0) 78.7% (64.3–89.3) 80.6% (64.0–91.8) 79.5%
P a ns ns ns ns ns ns

Abbreviations: Se, sensitivity, Spe, specificity; ns: nonsignificant (P > 0.05). aComparisons between fecal calprotectin >200 µg/g in ileal CD vs fecal calprotectin >250 µg/g in colonic or ileocolonic CD and between fecal calprotectin >250 µg/g in ileal CD vs colonic or ileocolonic CD.