Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;23(11):e31274. doi: 10.2196/31274

Table 5.

Statistical results of the therapeutic relationship and satisfaction with the therapy in patients with low expectations (below a median of 3.50, n=31) vs high expectations (above the median, n=52).

Variables ONL1a (n=30), mean (SD) F2Fb (n=24), mean (SD) ONL2c (n=29), mean (SD) CAUd F group P value Eta²
Relationship satisfaction (HAQ1e)







Low expectations 2.63 (0.67) 2.84 (0.95) 2.52 (1.01) N/Af 0.937 .40 .02

High expectations 2.90 (1.67) 2.98 (1.11) 2.38 (1.18)
Success satisfaction (HAQ2)







Low expectations 2.45 (0.61) 2.65 (0.83) 2.51 (1.18) N/A 0.697 .50 .018

High expectations 2.46 (1.60) 2.87 (1.26) 2.21 (1.17)
Satisfaction with therapyg







Low expectations 3.16 (0.41) 2.80 (0.65) 3.50 (0.43) N/A 3.907 .024 .092

High expectations 3.33 (0.94) 2.69 (1.06) 3.22 (0.91)

aONL1: online therapy in the equivalence study.

bF2F: face-to-face therapy in the equivalence study.

cONL2: online therapy in the superiority study.

dCAU: care as usual in the superiority study.

eHAQ: Helping Alliance Questionnaire.

fN/A: not applicable because not measured in the CAU group.

gEffect for expectation was not significant. Post-hoc tests revealed a significant difference between satisfaction and therapy: ONL1 > F2F (P=.05); ONL2 > F2F (P=.03).