Table 3.

Quantitative evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) during the visit by people with diabetes (N=12)^a.

Items		Single-item scoreb, mean (SD)
General dialog evaluation
	Did the HCPc make you feel comfortable talking about the topics that you needed to?	4.8 (0.6)
	Did the HCP give you the treatment, advice, referral, or other assistance that you needed?	4.6 (0.5)
	Did the HCP focus on what is most important to you?	4.5 (0.9)
	Did the HCP encourage you to give input or ask questions?	4.5 (0.7)
Evaluation of influence of use of PRO
	Interested in using PRO in future care	4.9 (0.3)
	PRO should be part of standard care	4.8 (0.4)
	The DiaProfil dashboard helped me talk about the important things	4.7 (0.3)
	HCP was more or less prepared because of use of PRO	4.4 (0.9)
	I felt more or less prepared because of use of PRO	4.4 (0.9)
	PRO dashboard gave a good picture of my situation, needs, and priorities related to my diabetes	4.3 (1.0)
	Any problems or uncomfortable experiences related to the use of DiaProfil in the dialog? If so, which?	1.3 (0.6)

^aMean single-item scores of evaluation by people with diabetes of use of PRO after the visit using the PRO-CON-EVAL-P-1A-pilot questionnaire.

^bScore range is 1-5, except for the last item, which is 1-3.

^cHCP: health care professional.