Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 5;6(45):30205–30213. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03504

Table 1. Comparison with the Current Method of Remadiating AMD.

technique advantage disadvantage ref
constructed wetlands low cost and maintenance low remediation efficiency (2)
  stable effluent and excellent load resistance poor sustainability  
    easily affected by the climatic and vegetation environment  
microorganisms allows for differential removal of metals Remediation efficiency is governed by heavy metal ions. (1)
  no secondary pollution requires continuous additions of organic substrates  
neutralization simple to operate Mo, Cr, and Hg cannot be insolubilized via pH control. (1), (2)
  low operating investment A considerable sludge will be generated.  
    requires large amounts of neutralizing agents  
adsorption simple to operate The adsorption capacity of conventional adsorbents is low. (3)
  strong affinity Some commercial adsorbents are expensive.  
  high effectiveness and flexibility