Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;35(11):1349–1355. doi: 10.1177/02698811211050548

Table 2.

Performance on CANTAB SWM, CANTAB CGT and CANTAB IED.

Cannabis (n = 39) Control (n = 20)
CANTAB SWM Between Search Errors 21.49 (15.99) 13.70 (13.67)
Strategy Score 31.36 (5.47) 29.15 (6.12)
CANTAB CGT Overall Proportion Bet 0.74 (0.17) 0.62 (0.16)
Deliberation Time 1763.49 (713.14) 1487.56 (540.78)
Quality of Decision Making 0.94 (0.08) 0.95 (0.08)
CANTAB IED Pre-ED Errors 7.71 (3.86) 6.10 (2.15)
ED Errors 6.31 (8.63) 7.45 (9.10)
Failed Stage 8 5 3

CANTAB: Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery; SWM: Spatial Working Memory; CGT: Cambridge Gamble Task; IED: Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift; FDR: false discovery rate.

Mean (SD) or contingency tables are displayed. CGT deliberation time p = 0.03 and SWM between search errors p = 0.04 did not survive FDR at q < .05.