Table 2:
Comparison of individual, partner and partnership characteristics predictive of consistency of condom use during receptive anal intercourse as reported by women and men who have sex with men (MSM) in partnerships, Safe in the City Trial, 2003-5.a
| INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS: POPULATION REPORTING RECEPTIVE AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Covariate | Women (N=171) | MSM (N=184) | ||
|
| ||||
| 0%-99% #(%) | 100% #(%) | 0%-99% #(%) | 100% #(%) | |
| Education | p=0.6523 | 0.0102 | ||
| <HS | 61(76.3) | 19(23.7) | 22(84.6) | 4(15.4) |
| HS+ | 72(79.1) | 19(20.9) | 92(58.2) | 66(41.8) |
|
| ||||
| Marital status | 0.1470b | 0.0469b | ||
| Never married | 102(74.5) | 35(25.5) | 105(61.0) | 67(39.0) |
| Married | 13(92.9) | 1(7.1) | 0(0.0) | 2(100.0) |
| Divorces/Separated/Widowed | 18(90.0) | 2(10.0) | 8(88.9) | 1(11.1) |
|
| ||||
| Race/Ethnicity | 0.9824 | 0.4575b | ||
| White | 46(78.0) | 13(22.0) | 58(58.0) | 42(42.0) |
| Black | 32(78.0) | 9(22.0) | 4(80.0) | 1(20.0) |
| Hispanic | 34(79.0) | 9(21.0) | 29(70.7) | 12(29.3) |
| Other | 21(75.0) | 7(25.0) | 21(58.3) | 15(41.7) |
|
| ||||
| STI in past 3 months | 0.7660b | 0.4859b | ||
| Yes | 15(83.3) | 3(16.7) | 7(77.8) | 2(22.2) |
| No/don’t know | 117(77.5) | 34(22.5) | 106(60.9) | 68(39.1) |
| PARTNER CHARACTERISTICS | ||||
|
| ||||
| Covariate | Women (N=254) | Receptive MSM (N=425) | ||
|
| ||||
| 0%-99% #(%) | 100% #(%) | 0%-99% #(%) | 100% #(%) | |
|
| ||||
| Partner has other sex partners OR[95%CI] |
1.38 [0.76, 2.51] | 1.95 [1.28, 2.97] | ||
| Yes | 74(73.3) | 27(26.7) | 125(48.5) | 133(51.6) |
| No/don’t know(ref) | 121(79.1) | 32(20.9) | 108(64.7) | 59(35.3) |
|
| ||||
| Believe partner gave respondent STI OR[95%CI] |
2.20 [1.02, 4.72] | 1.81 [1.20, 2.75] | ||
| Yes(ref) | 65(85.5) | 11(14.5) | 87(63.5) | 50(36.5) |
| No/don’t know | 129(72.9) | 48(27.1) | 145(50.5) | 142(49.5) |
| PARTNERSHIP CHARACTERISTICSc | ||||
|
| ||||
| Covariate | Women (N=254) | Receptive MSM (N=425) | ||
|
| ||||
| 0%-99% #(%) | 100% #(%) | 0%-99% #(%) | 100% #(%) | |
|
| ||||
| Interview interval OR[95%CI] |
1.77 [0.97, 3.25] | 1.30 [0.87, 1.96] | ||
| Baseline | 120(81.1) | 28(18.9) | 39(57.7) | 102(42.3) |
| Follow-up(ref) | 75(70.8) | 31(29.2) | 94(51.1) | 90(48.9) |
|
| ||||
| Type of partnership OR[95%CI] |
0.52 [0.26, 1.03] | 0.26 [0.17, 0.40] | ||
| Main | 159(79.5) | 41(20.5) | 128(73.6) | 6(26.4) |
| Non-main(ref) | 36(66.7) | 18(33.3) | 105(41.8) | 146(58.2) |
|
| ||||
| Drunk or high during anal sex OR[95%CI] |
0.92 [0.49, 1.73] | 0.63 [0.42, 0.95] | ||
| Yes | 80(77.7) | 23(22.3) | 104(61.5) | 65(38.5) |
| No(ref) | 115(76.2) | 36(23.8) | 129(50.4) | 127(49.6) |
|
| ||||
| Number of anal sex acts OR[95%CI] |
3.33 [1.13, 9.83] | 7.21 [3.74, 13.92] | ||
| 1-5 acts | 157(74.1) | 55(25.9) | 162(47.2) | 181(52.8) |
| 6 or more acts(ref) | 38(90.5) | 4(9.5) | 71(86.6) | 11(13.4) |
a
P-values are given for Pearson’s chi-squared test
b
P-values for Fisher’s exact test for low cell counts
c
Generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach was used for bivariate analysis to account for potential correlation among partnerships for the same respondent