Table 5:

Adjusted odds ratios in favor of consistent condom use during receptive anal intercourse for partnerships among women and men who have sex with men (MSM), Safe in the City Trial, 2003-5.^a

Covariate	Women (N=236) Adjusted OR[95%CI]	Receptive MSM (N=412) Adjusted OR[95%CI]
RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS
Education
< HS	1.1 [0.5, 2.7]	0.8 [0.3, 1.8]
HS+	ref	ref
Total number of sex partners	1.04 [0.96,1.13]	0.98 [0.96, 1.01]
Intention to use condoms with all partners	2.8 [1.3, 6.3] b	5.1 [2.8, 9.5] d
Condom use beliefs	0.8 [0.5, 1.3]	1.3 [0.9, 1.8]
Ability to stop having sex without condoms	1.8 [1.0, 3.2] b	0.9 [0.5, 1.4]
PARTNER CHARACTERISTICS
Partner has other sex partners
Yes	2.0 [0.9,4.5]	1.4 [0.8, 2.7]
No	ref	ref
Believe partner gave respondent STI
Yes	ref	ref
No	3.0 [1.0, 9.0] b	2.3 [1.3, 4.0] c
Partner support for condom use	1.7 [1.0, 3.0]b	2.2 [1.4, 3.5] d
PARTNERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS
Type of partnership
Main	ref	ref
Non-main	2.0 [0.8,4.9]	4.3 [2.2, 8.6] d
Condom use self-efficacy in the partnership	1.4 [0.9, 2.1]	1.5 [1.0, 2.5]b
Number of anal sex acts
1-5 acts	2.7 [0.7, 10.9]	3.7 [1.6, 8.7] c
6 or more	ref	ref

^aOdds ratios are also adjusted for age, marital status (for women but not for MSM due to no observations of married couples who used condoms inconsistently), race/ethnicity, and study site.

^bp<0.05,

^cp<0.01,

^dp<0.001