Table 10. A summary of dynamic surface EMG data collection, recording and signal processing.
PREPARATION/RECORDING | SIGNAL PROCESSING | RESULTS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Muscles [Preparation Described] | Recording Device [Sampling Frequency] | Filter Passband [Stim artefact filtration] | Rectification | Cycle averaging | Amplitude Normalization | Output Presented |
Hofstoetter et al., 2013 [6] | Q, Ham, TA, TS | Wired EMS Handels system | 10–500 Hz | Raw EMG | - | - | Exemplary raw EMG traces during stepping. Qualitative comparison of stim on/off |
[✓] | [2048Hz] | [✗] | |||||
Gerasimenko et al., 2015 [67] | Sol, MG, TA, med ham, VL | Wired A/D board and customized labVIEW software | 10–10,000Hz | - | - | - | Exemplary raw EMG during voluntary movement. Scatter-plot of antagonistic muscle activity patterns. Qualitative description of EMG change during stim. |
[✗] | [10,000Hz] | [✓] | |||||
Hofstoetter et al., 2015 [18] | Q, Ham, TA, TS | EMS-Handels system | 10–500 Hz | RMS | 10 gait cycles | EMG during stance and swing phase normalized to muscle activity with stim off | Exemplary raw EMG during stepping. Radar chart of RMS during stance and swing. Qualitative comparison of stim on/off |
[✓] | [2048Hz] | [✓] | |||||
Bedi, 2016 [68] | Q, Ham, TA, TP | Neurostim Medicad System | 10–500 Hz | RMS | 3 repetitions per side | - | Tables of RMS data during voluntary movement before and after stim |
[✓] | [NS] | [✗] | |||||
Minassian et al., 2016 [19] | Q, Ham, TA, TS, TFL | Wired Poly-EMG system (EMS-Handels) | 20–500 Hz | RMS | 10 gait cycles | - | Within subject quantitative comparison (ANOVA) of RMS data for treadmill speed x hip extension. Exemplary raw EMG during stepping and standing. |
[✓] | [2048Hz] | [✓] | |||||
Gad et al., 2017 [41] | Sol, MG, TA, med ham, VL | Wired Powerlab and LabChart. Delsys EMG System also mentioned. | 10–1000 Hz | Integrated | 30 steps | - | Exemplary raw EMG and iEMG during stepping and voluntary movement. Exemplary evoked responses. Qualitative comparison of EMG during passive and active stepping during the intervention. |
[✓] | [10,000Hz] | [✓] | 5 evoked responses | ||||
Freyvert et al,. 2018 [44] | FD, ED, BR, BB, TB | Konigsberg EMG system | - | - | 9 x 3.5 sec hand-grip Repetition | - | Quantitative comparison of raw EMG amplitude across each test phase Exemplary raw EMG during voluntary hand grip tasks. |
[✗] | [NS] | [✗] | |||||
Rath et al., 2018 [37] | RA, Obl, E-T7, E-L3, RF, delt | Wired Powerlab 16/35 | 10–2000 Hz | Full wave rectification | - | - | Exemplary rectified EMG during trunk movement. Quantitative comparison of mean EMG with stim on/off. |
[✗] | [2000Hz] | [✓] | |||||
Gad et al., 2018 [43] | BB, FD, ED | Wired Powerlab | 10–10,000Hz, 60Hz Notch | Integrated | 5 evoked responses per intensity | Evoked responses normalized to baseline. | Exemplary raw and iEMG of evoked responses. Exemplary raw EMG traces during voluntary contractions. Quantitative comparison of iEMG response to stim on/off and pre- post-intervention |
[✗] | [10,000Hz] | [✗] | |||||
Inanici et al., 2018 [36] | Delt, TB, BB, BR, ED, FD, ADM, thenar muscles | Wired Delsys Bagnoli system | - | Raw EMG | - | - | Examplary trace of evoked response in thenar muscles compared every 2 weeks across intervention. |
[✗] | [1000Hz] | [✗] | |||||
Sayenko et al., 2019 [42] | Sol, TA, VL, med ham | Wired Powerlab | 10–2000 Hz | Full wave rectification and RMS | 6 evoked responses | EMG during anterior/posterior weight shift normalized to activity during initial position | Exemplary raw EMG during transition and standing. Quantitative comparison of mean EMG between stim on/off, sitting and standing and Quantitative comparison of RMS EMG and motor thresholds across training sessions. |
[✗] | [4000Hz] | [✓] | |||||
Al’Joboori et al., 2020 [69] | Q, TA, ham, gastric | Wired CED Power 1401 | 10–200 Hz | RMS (0.4s window). Integrated to average level of rectified signal. | 3 trials with flex/ext phases | - | Intergrated EMG activity pre and post trial temporally normalized to phase of movement |
[✗] | [2000Hz] | [✗] | |||||
Alam et al., 2020 [40] | Q, TA, ham, gastric | Wireless, BTS Telemg | [✗] | P2P amplitude of MEPs. | - | - | Exemplary raw EMG during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit task. Intensity response curves for each muscle. |
[✗] | [2000Hz] | ||||||
Meyer et al. 2020 [70] | 1) RF, VM, ST, TA, MG | 1) Wireless Aktos System | 1) 10–500 Hz | Noise corrected RMS | 1) 20 cycles of each rep ankle movements | Tonic stim responses normalized to the respective values in the tSCS-off condition using z-scores | Exemplary data comparing stim off vs. on - 15Hz/30Hz/50Hz |
[2000Hz] | 2) 20 Hz—3000 Hz | normalized RMS stim off vs. on - 15Hz/30Hz/50Hz | |||||
2) Spinal reflex protocol: bilateral TA | 2) Dantec Keypoint Focus Workstation | [✓] | 2) 5 spinal reflexes | phase of gait muscle activity | |||
[✗] | [6000Hz] | ||||||
Shapkova et al., 2020 [38] | RF, BF, GL, TA | Viasys Viking Select | - | - | - | - | Exemplary trace of H-Reflex and MMR reseponse. |
[✗] | [2000Hz] | [✗] | |||||
Zhang et al., 2020 [71] | Trap, delt, BB, TB, BR, ECU, FCR, ECR | Wired MA-400 Motion Lab Systems | 10–1000 Hz 60Hz Notch | Integrated | 3 evoked responses | - | Evoked potential amplitudes pre- and post-stimulation intervention |
[✗] | [10200 Hz] | [✗] |
Abbreviations: BB; biceps brachii, BR; brachioradialis, delt; deltoid, ED; extensor digitorum, E-L3; erector spinae at level of L3, EMG; electromyography, E-T7; erector spinae at level of T7, ECU; extensor carpi ulnaris, ECR; extensor carpi radialis, FCU; flexor carpi ulnaris, FD; flexor digitorum, Ham; hamstrings, iEMG; integrated EMG, med ham; medial hamstrings, MG; medial gastrocnemius, obl; external oblique, P2P; peak-to-peak, PL; Peroneus Longus, Q; quadriceps, RA; rectus abdominis, RF; rectus femoris, RMS; root mean square, sol; soleus, ST; semitendinosus, TA; Tibialis Anterior, TB; triceps brachii, TFL; tensor fascia lata, TP; tibialis posterior, Trap; trapezius, TB; triceps brachii, TS; triceps surae, VL; vastus lateralis.
* Recording electrodes described refers to a clear description of preparation of the skin before surface electrode application, recording electrode type, orientation, shape and composition as well as interelectrode distance.
† Artifact filtering refers to an attempt made by the authors to account for and remove artifacts contaminating or obscuring the recorded EMG signals such as with the use of a filter or reference EMG electrodes for artefact cancellation.