Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 9;11(22):16327–16343. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8332

TABLE 3.

Comparison of larval site physical characteristics

Comparison a La Lopé Rabai
δ b E(δ) b p b δ b E(δ) b p b
Forest vs. peridomestic 8873 9375 .005 4986 6566 .008
Forest vs. domestic n.a. c n.a. n.a. 18,970 25,424 .008
Peridomestic vs. domestic n.a. n.a. n.a. 40,384 41,099 .441
Forest + vs. peridomestic + 22,056 22,509 .280 7180 8626 .012
Forest + vs. domestic + n.a. n.a. n.a. 29,491 36,206 .008
Peridomestic + vs. domestic + n.a. n.a. n.a. 40,523 41,604 .441
Ae. aegypti + vs. Aeaegypti 9356 9375 .918 23,248 24,833 .008
Forest + vs. forest − 759 752 1 1286 1306 0.441
Peridomestic + vs. peridomestic − 20,864 20,505 1 n.a. n.a. n.a.
a

“+” and “−” denote Ae. aegypti present and absent sites, respectively.

b

Results of multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP) with 999 permutations. δ: overall weighted mean of within‐group means of the pairwise dissimilarities; E(δ): expected δ under the null hypothesis of no group structure; p: p‐values after Holm adjustment of multiple comparisons, with boldness indicating statistical significance (p < .05).

c

Comparisons were not available as no domestic larval sites were sampled in La Lopé, and all but one peridomestic and domestic larval sites in Rabai were Ae. aegypti present (+).