Table 5.
Results for the fixed effects computed in the general assessment considering Level-1 and Level-2 variables
| Factor | F | df1 | df2 | exp(B) | d | p | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| snr | 31.28 | 1 | 1955 | 0.85 | 2.34 | 0.47 | .000 | 1.74 | 3.76 |
| reinf (positive) | 0.01 | 1 | 1955 | 0.02 | 1.02 | 0.01 | .920 | 0.71 | 1.47 |
| reinf (negative) | 0.24 | 1 | 1955 | − 0.09 | 0.91 | − 0.05 | .628 | 0.63 | 1.32 |
| emo (sadness) | 5.43 | 1 | 1955 | 0.44 | 1.55 | 0.24 | .020 | 1.07 | 2.23 |
| emo (anger) | 2.56 | 1 | 1955 | 0.30 | 1.35 | 0.17 | .110 | 0.94 | 1.94 |
| age | 3.91 | 1 | 1955 | 0.06 | 1.06 | 0.03 | .048 | 1.00 | 1.12 |
The GLMM was performed on the responses given by the 109 children, considering task-id and user-id as crossed random effects, the Level-1 slope age as randomly varying, and the Level-2 predictors: snr, reinforcement–reinf (positive and negative w. r. t. the reference no reinforcement), emotion–emo (the negative emotions sadness and anger w. r. t. the positive emotion happiness), and the Level-1 predictor age as fixed effects; F-statistic (F), degrees of freedom 1 (df1) and 2 (df2), coefficient , effect size: exp(B) and Cohen’s d, p–value, and 95% confidence intervals (CI): lower and upper, are given