Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;23(1):169–182. doi: 10.1007/s10772-020-09675-1

Table 5.

Results for the fixed effects computed in the general assessment considering Level-1 and Level-2 variables

Factor F df1 df2 β exp(B) d p 95% CI
Lower Upper
snr 31.28 1 1955 0.85 2.34 0.47 .000 1.74 3.76
reinf (positive) 0.01 1 1955 0.02 1.02 0.01 .920 0.71 1.47
reinf (negative) 0.24 1 1955 − 0.09 0.91 − 0.05 .628 0.63 1.32
emo (sadness) 5.43 1 1955 0.44 1.55 0.24 .020 1.07 2.23
emo (anger) 2.56 1 1955 0.30 1.35 0.17 .110 0.94 1.94
age 3.91 1 1955 0.06 1.06 0.03 .048 1.00 1.12

The GLMM was performed on the responses given by the 109 children, considering task-id and user-id as crossed random effects, the Level-1 slope age as randomly varying, and the Level-2 predictors: snr, reinforcement–reinf (positive and negative w. r. t. the reference no reinforcement), emotion–emo (the negative emotions sadness and anger w. r. t. the positive emotion happiness), and the Level-1 predictor age as fixed effects; F-statistic (F), degrees of freedom 1 (df1) and 2 (df2), coefficient β, effect size: exp(B) and Cohen’s d, p–value, and 95% confidence intervals (CI): lower and upper, are given