Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;35(12):3311–3317. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01404-5

Table 3.

Comparison of 1-year outcomes between the central (3 mm) and paracentral (>3 mm) cones.

Parameter Central Paracentral ap value bp value
SEQ (D) −2.84 ± 3.75 −3.66 ± 4.88 0.28 0.04
Astigmatism (D) 3.00 ± 2.04 3.94 ± 2.05 0.006 0.24
BSCVA (logMAR) 0.21 ± 0.19 0.31 ± 0.25 0.02 <0.001
CCT (μ) 489.7 ± 47.8 479.2 ± 57.4 0.24 0.15
MCT (μ) 468.2 ± 48.6 455.9 ± 57.9 0.18 0.38
Corneal astigmatism (D) 3.25 ± 1.96 3.93 ± 1.82 0.03 0.72
Kmax (D) 56.0 ± 8.0 57.0 ± 9.6 0.50 0.99
Coma (μ) 2.84 ± 1.59 3.37 ± 1.72 0.07 0.76
%Progression > 2D 6.7% 6.5% 0.96 0.83

SEQ spherical equivalent, BSCVA best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, CCT central corneal thickness, MCT minimal corneal thickness, Kmax maximum keratometry.

aStudent’s t test and chi-square.

bAdjusted for age, baseline BSCVA, corneal astigmatism, baseline kmax and coma with regression analysis.