Table 5.
Studies assessing cone location as a predictor of outcomes following cross-linking.
Author | Eyes/pts | Population | aTwo eye stats | MVA | Methodology | Protocol | Cone location and main outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greenstein et al. [8] | 104/NA | KC, ectasia | NA | Yes | Prospective | 30 min | No association with main outcomes. |
Toprak et al. [5] | 99/99 | KC | 1 eye per patient | No | Retrospective | 30 min | No association with main outcomes. |
Wisse et al. [9] | 102/79 | KC | Adjusted statistics | Yes | Prospective | 30 min |
Eccentricity associated with Kmax outcome. Visual outcome not associated with eccentricity. |
Koc et al. [10] | 162/146 | KC | No adjustment | Yes | Retrospective | 10 min | No association with main outcomes. |
Sarac et al. [11] | 72/52 | Pediatric KC | No adjustment | Yes | Retrospective | 30 min | Eccentricity associated with Kmax outcome. |
Mimouni et al. | 314/314 | KC | 1 eye per patient | Yes | Prospective | 10 min |
No association with Kmax outcome. Eccentricity associated with visual outcome. Eccentricity associated with myopia reduction. |
Pts patients, KC keratoconus, MVA multivariate analysis, NA not available.
aTwo eye stats—how authors dealt with two eyes per patient in statistical analyses.