Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 12;2016(1):CD005340. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005340.pub4

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Summary of survival outcomes.

IP component therapy compared with IV therapy for initial management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer
Patient or population: Women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer
Settings: Hospital setting
Intervention: Intraperitoneal component therapy
Comparison: Intravenous therapy
Outcomes Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Overall survival HR 0.81 (0.72 to 0.90) 2026 women
(8 trials)
⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high Homogeneous data. When only the six high quality trials were considered HR = 0.80 (0.72 to 0.90) .
Progression‐free survival HR 0.78 (0.70 to 0.86) 1311 women(5 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high Homogeneous data.
CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard Ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.