Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 19;184(26):6229–6242.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.026

Figure 7.

Figure 7

WTΔ and variantΔ dynamics in simulations with full control measures

(A) Dynamics of WTΔ and variant 1Δ in simulations with different start times and rates of vaccine rollout.

(B) Dynamics of WTΔ and variant 2Δ.

(C) Dynamics of WTΔ and variant 3Δ. In (A)–(C), points on the y axis indicate the total numbers of primary infections (circles) and reinfections/breakthrough infections (triangles); gray shading indicates vaccine rollout.

(D) Total infections in simulations with each hypothetical variant.

(E) Percentage of all infections which occur in recovered/vaccinated individuals (reinfections and breakthrough infections).

(F) Total number of primary infections. In all simulations, WTΔ and variantΔ are introduced at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Vaccine coverage and efficacy are assumed to be 100% and 95%, respectively, and NPIs are maintained throughout all simulations. WTΔ is assumed to have R0 = 6, and variantΔ phenotypes are as follows: variant 0Δ, identical to WTΔ; variant 1Δ, 60% greater transmissibility; variant 2Δ, 40% immune escape; variant 3Δ, 60% greater transmissibility and 40% immune escape.