Table 2.
Agree II quality assessment - standardised scores of each domain for guidelines.
Column1 |
Barazzoni et al., 2020 |
Chapple et al., June 2020 |
Aytür et al., 2020 |
Chen et al., 2020 |
Jin et al., 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domains | Scaled domain scores (%) | ||||
1. Scope and purpose | 100 | 98 | 100 | 72 | 87 |
2. Stakeholder involvement | 44 | 70 | 69 | 43 | 74 |
3. Rigour of development | 30 | 41 | 61 | 25 | 73 |
4. Clarity of presentation | 83 | 94 | 80 | 48 | 50 |
5. Applicability | 46 | 83 | 50 | 42 | 56 |
6. Editorial independence | 78 | 78 | 100 | 75 | 100 |
R1: overall quality [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]] | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
R1: recommendation for use | Y + mod | Y + mod | Y + mod | N | Y + mod |
R2: overall quality [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]] | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
R2: recommendation for use | Y + mod | Y + mod | Y + mod | N | Y |
R3: overall quality [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]] | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
R3: recommendation for use | Y + mod | Y | Y + mod | N | Y |
Overall recommendation Overall quality judgementa (Very low, Low, Moderate, High) |
Y + mod Moderate |
Y + mod Moderate |
Y + mod Moderate |
N Low |
Y Moderate |
R - reviewer; Y - yes; mod - modifications; N – no;
Based on 60% threshold.