Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 16;9:e12461. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12461

Table 1. Characteristics of balance score and isokinetic strength variables for dominant and non-dominant leg.

Variables Dominant
leg
Non-dominant
leg
Δ%
(95% CL)
Mean ± SD
Balance control
BAL score
[degrees]
11.34 ± 2.67 11.29 ± 2.47 9.56
(7.94–11.17)
Isokinetic variables of angular velocity at 60 ° s −1
PT-Q*
[Nm kg−1]
3.19 ± 0.37 3.07 ± 0.43 7.93
(6.39–9.47)
PT-H*
[Nm kg−1]
1.90 ± 0.31 1.76 ± 0.27 10.04
(8.40–11.67)
H/Q*
Ratio
0.60 ± 0.09 0.58 ± 0.09 10.27
(8.50–12.04)
Isokinetic variables of angular velocity at 240 ° s −1
PT-Q*
[Nm kg−1]
2.06 ± 0.25 2.00 ± 0.28 7.32
(5.96–8.68)
PT-H*
[Nm kg−1]
1.36 ± 0.21 1.28 ± 0.19 8.66
(7.48–9.84)
H/Q
Ratio
0.66 ± 0.08 0.65 ± 0.10 9.34
(7.91–10.77)
TW-Q*
[J kg−1]
52.05 ± 7.39 50.72 ± 6.94 7.46
(6.16–8.77)
TW-H*
[J kg−1]
32.29 ± 6.92 31.38 ± 6.82 8.46
(7.10–9.82)

Notes.

*

Significant differences between legs (P < 0.05).

PT-Q
peak torque of the quadriceps
PT-H
peak torque of the hamstrings
H/Q
hamstrings/quadriceps ratio
TW-Q
total work of the quadriceps
TW-H
total work of the hamstrings
BAL score
balance score