Table 6.
Odds ratios for the effect of location on likelihood of reporting individual motivation-related barriers (reference: urban).
Any motivation-related barriers | Prefer to be active | Confidence to be active | Enjoy physical activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Base model | 0.78 [0.69, 0.89] | 0.71 [0.60, 0.84] | 0.94 [0.80, 1.12] | 0.81 [0.68, 0.97] |
Final model | 0.69 [0.60, 0.79] | 0.69 [0.58, 0.81] | <Secondary school: 0.62 [0.43, 0.91] | Income$0-29.9k: 0.48 [0.32, 0.71] |
Secondary school: 0.59 [0.40, 0.85] | Income$30-59.9k: 1.14 [0.83, 1.57] | |||
Post-secondary: 0.96 [0.74, 1.23] | Income$60-99.9k: 0.57 [0.38, 0.88] | |||
Income$100-149.9k: 0.77 [0.51, 1.18] | ||||
Income$150k+: 0.86 [0.50, 1.46] |
Note: The optimally fitted model for reporting any motivation-related barrier included the covariates age, BMI, income, perceived health, and sense of belonging to community. The optimally fitted model for preference to be active included the same covariates with the addition of sex. The optimally fitted model for confidence to be active included sex, age, BMI, income, perceived health, sense of belonging to community, and education. The optimally fitted model for enjoyment of physical activity included covariates sex, BMI, income, perceived health, and sense of belonging to community.