Table 7.

Odds ratios for the effect of location on likelihood of reporting social and built environmental barriers (reference: urban).

	Any environmental barriers	See people active	Access to facilities	Support to be active
Base model	1.86 [1.67, 2.07]	1.22 [1.07, 1.41]	4.13 [3.57, 4.79]	1.25 [1.11, 1.40]
Final model	1.84 [1.65, 2.06]	Income$0-29.9k: 0.89 [0.67, 1.19]	4.15 [3.58, 4.83]	1.17 [1.04, 1.32]
		Income$30-59.9k: 1.11 [0.86, 1.43]
		Income$60-99.9k: 1.24 [0.94, 1.65]
		Income$100-149.9k: 1.09 [0.78, 1.50]
		Income$150k+: 2.06 [1.39, 3.04]

Note: The optimally fitted model for reporting any social or built environmental barrier included covariates season of data collection, sex, age, income, perceived health, and sense of belonging to community. The optimally fitted model for seeing people active in community included covariates season of data collection, sex, income, and sense of belonging to community. The optimally fitted model for access to facilities included covariates age, income, perceived health, and sense of belonging to community. Finally, the optimally fitted model for receiving support to be active included covariates season of data collection, sex, age, income, perceived health and sense of belonging to community.