Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;36(6):684–690. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001035

Table 3.

Comparison of EIS for Each Type of Disaster among the Same Age Group

Disaster Type Younger Group A
(n = 28)
Younger Group N
(n = 56)
P Valuea Older Group A
(n = 51)
Older Group N
(n = 43)
P Valuea
Natural 78.0 (SD = 25.9) 80.1 (SD = 20.9) .68 85.9 (SD = 17.8) 83.4 (SD = 18.1) .50
Human-Made 78.0 (SD = 27.1) 82.9 (SD = 21.2) .36 81.2 (SD = 25.6) 83.1 (SD = 20.2) .70
Chemical 60.9 (SD = 30.8) 37.4 (SD = 32.3) <.01 57.6 (SD = 35.7) 50.3 (SD = 35.6) .33
Biological 55.3 (SD = 31.9) 35.5 (SD = 32.6) <.01 54.5 (SD = 37.3) 49.4 (SD = 35.7) .50
Radiological/Nuclear 63.0 (SD = 31.9) 41.3 (SD = 35.0) <.01 72.1 (SD = 31.2) 58.0 (SD = 35.3) .04
Explosive 61.1 (SD = 32.4) 44.6 (SD = 35.2) .04 56.8 (SD = 36.4) 51.6 (SD = 38.3) .51

Abbreviation: EIS, engagement intent score.

a

P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.