Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;2021(11):CD004407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub5

Summary of findings 9. Safety: autistic spectrum disorders.

Safety: autistic spectrum disorders
Patient or population: children 9 months to 15 years old
Setting: general population
Intervention: MMR vaccine
Comparison: unvaccinated
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk of ASD amongst unvaccinated Risk of ASD amongst vaccinated
Cohort studies ‐ all children, MMR Study population Rate ratio 0.93
(0.85 to 1.01) 1,194,764
(2 observational studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1  
451 per 100,000 419 per 100,000
(383 to 455)
Cohort studies ‐ autism risk (low), MMR Study population Rate ratio 1.00
(0.89 to 1.14) 93,071
(1 observational study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1  
85 per 100,000 85 per 100,000
(76 to 97)
Cohort studies ‐ autism risk (moderate/high), MMR Study population Rate ratio 0.80
(0.64 to 0.98) 1914
(1 observational study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW The apparent protective effect is due to indication bias.
12 per 1000 9 per 1000
(7 to 11)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
ASD: autism spectrum disorders; CI: confidence interval; MMR: measles, mumps, rubella vaccine
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Upgraded one level due to residual confounding ‐ confounding expected to increase the effect but no effect was observed.