Summary of findings 10. Safety: inflammatory bowel disease.
Safety: inflammatory bowel disease | |||||
Patient or population: children 9 months to 15 years old Setting: general population Intervention: MMR vaccine Comparison: unvaccinated | |||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | |
Risk of IBD amongst unvaccinated | Risk of IBD amongst vaccinated | ||||
Case control ‐ all IBD, MMR | Study population | OR 1.42 (0.93 to 2.16) | 409 cases, 1416 controls (3 observational studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE1 | |
0 per 1000 | 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) | ||||
Case control ‐ ulcerative colitis, MMR | Study population | OR 1.35 (0.81 to 2.23) | 292 cases, 582 controls (2 observational studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE1 | |
0 per 1000 | 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) | ||||
Case control ‐ Crohn's disease, MMR | Study population | OR 0.64 (0.42 to 0.98) | 514 cases, 804 controls (3 observational studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE1 | |
0 per 1000 | 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) | ||||
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; MMR: measles, mumps, rubella vaccine; OR: odds ratio | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
1Upgraded one level due to residual confounding ‐ confounding expected to increase the effect but no effect was observed.