Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;2021(11):CD004407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub5

29. Risk of bias.

  Study design Low risk of bias Unclear risk of bias High risk of bias  
n Row % n Row % n Row % n total
Effectiveness
studies RCT/CCT 3 100%         3
Case‐control 8 57.1% 4 28.6% 2 14.3% 14
Prospective/retrospective cohort 4 13.0% 21 67.7% 6 19.4% 31
Case‐only ecological method     2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3
Subtotal 15 29.4% 27 53.0% 9 17.6% 51
 
  Study design Low risk of bias Unclear risk of bias High risk of bias  
n Row % n Row % n Row % n total
Safety
studies RCT/CCT 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 7
Case‐control 8 38.1% 11 52.4% 2 9.5% 21
Prospective/retrospective cohort 14 43.8% 4 12.5% 14 43.8% 32
Self‐controlled case series/person‐time cohort 11 68.8% 5 31.2%     16
Case cross‐over 1 33.3% 2 66.7%     3
Case‐only ecological method 2 25.0% 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 8
Subtotal 38 43.7% 28 32.2% 21 24.1% 87
Total (all studies) 53 38.4% 55 39.9% 30 21.7% 138
 
  Study design Low risk of bias Unclear risk of bias High risk of bias  
n Row % n Row % n Row % n total
Safety studies
(excluding short‐term side effects
studies) Case‐control 8 38% 11 52% 2 10% 21
Prospective/retrospective cohort 14 64% 4 18% 4 18% 22
Self‐controlled case series/person‐time cohort 11 69% 5 31%     16
Case cross‐over 1 33% 2 67%     3
Case‐only ecological method 2 25% 4 50% 2 25% 8
Total 36 51% 26 37% 8 11% 70

CCT: controlled clinical trial
RCT: randomised controlled trial