ba‐Andrade 2018.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Matched case‐control study (from November 2013 to December 2015) carried out in São Paulo and Goiânia (southeast and Midwest regions, respectively, in Brazil) | |
Participants | Cases: defined as children aged 15 to 32 months with rash and either suspected as having varicella by an attending physician or being a contact to a confirmed varicella case. Cases were confirmed by either clinical or laboratory criteria. Controls: 2 neighbourhood controls were selected for each case. |
|
Interventions | MMRV manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. Evidence of prior vaccination was obtained from vaccination cards. | |
Outcomes | Cases were further classified by severity of disease based on number of skin lesions, being 1 of:
Having been hospitalised or having any complication |
|
Funding Source | Government | |
Notes | Conclusions: effectiveness of single‐dose varicella vaccine in Brazil is comparable to that in other countries where breakthrough varicella cases have also been found to have occurred. The goal of the varicella vaccination programme, along with disease burden and affordability, should be taken into consideration when considering the adoption of a second dose of varicella vaccine into national immunisation programmes. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
CCS ‐ case selection | Low risk | Adequate ‐ laboratory‐confirmed |
CCS ‐ control selection | Low risk | Adequate ‐ community control |
CCS ‐ comparability | Low risk | Adequate ‐ for each case of varicella, 2 neighbourhood controls were selected, matched by age (15 to 32 months) |
CCS ‐ exposures | Low risk | Adequate ‐ secure record ‐ vaccination cards |
Summary Risk of Bias assessment | Low risk | Plausible bias is unlikely to have seriously altered the results. |