Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;2021(11):CD004407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub5

ba‐Andrade 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Matched case‐control study (from November 2013 to December 2015) carried out in São Paulo and Goiânia (southeast and Midwest regions, respectively, in Brazil)
Participants Cases: defined as children aged 15 to 32 months with rash and either suspected as having varicella by an attending physician or being a contact to a confirmed varicella case. Cases were confirmed by either clinical or laboratory criteria.
Controls: 2 neighbourhood controls were selected for each case.
Interventions MMRV manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. Evidence of prior vaccination was obtained from vaccination cards.
Outcomes Cases were further classified by severity of disease based on number of skin lesions, being 1 of:
  • mild – fewer than 50 lesions;

  • mild/moderate – between 50 and 249 lesions;

  • moderate – between 250 and 499 lesions; or

  • severe – 500 lesions or more.


Having been hospitalised or having any complication
Funding Source Government
Notes Conclusions: effectiveness of single‐dose varicella vaccine in Brazil is comparable to that in other countries where breakthrough varicella cases have also been found to have occurred. The goal of the varicella vaccination programme, along with disease burden and affordability, should be taken into consideration when considering the adoption of a second dose of varicella vaccine into national immunisation programmes.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
CCS ‐ case selection Low risk Adequate ‐ laboratory‐confirmed
CCS ‐ control selection Low risk Adequate ‐ community control
CCS ‐ comparability Low risk Adequate ‐ for each case of varicella, 2 neighbourhood controls were selected, matched by age (15 to 32 months)
CCS ‐ exposures Low risk Adequate ‐ secure record ‐ vaccination cards
Summary Risk of Bias assessment Low risk Plausible bias is unlikely to have seriously altered the results.