ca‐Ong 2007.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Retrospective cohort study carried out in Singapore during a measles outbreak in April to May 2004 in primary 3 and 6 school to evaluate MMR vaccine effectiveness | |
Participants | Participants of the 5 affected classes in primary 3 degree and primary 6 degree (N = 184) (age 8 to 14 years) out of the school enrolment of 1309 students | |
Interventions | MMR vaccine (no description). Only 1 dose administered. Data about vaccination (date and type of vaccine administered) were noted in health booklet of each child and confirmed with the National Immunisation Registry. |
|
Outcomes | Measles cases laboratory‐confirmed, defined according to WHO 2001 criteria: "recent absentees who had been clinically diagnosed as measles or who had displayed symptoms and sign characterized by generalized maculopapular rash and fever, with or without cough, coryza or conjunctivitis" | |
Funding Source | Government | |
Notes | Very bad reporting | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
PCS/RCS ‐ exposed cohort selection | Low risk | Vaccination status of the cases was obtained from children's booklets and confirmed by National Immunisation Registry. |
PCS/RCS ‐ non‐exposed cohort selection | Low risk | Drawn from the same community |
PCS/RCS ‐ comparability | Unclear risk | The cohort was limited to affected classes, with a very complex mix of ethnicity. |
PCS/RCS ‐ assessment of outcome | Low risk | Measles cases laboratory‐confirmed, defined according to WHO 2001 criteria. |
Summary Risk of Bias assessment | Unclear risk | We had concerns regarding at least 1 domain such that some doubt is raised about the results. |