Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;2021(11):CD004407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub5
Study Reason for exclusion
Akobeng 1999 Commentary relating to an excluded study (Wakefield 1998)
Andre 1984 No direct data on MMR, only observation that it may interfere with varicella vaccine
Anonymous 1982 Non‐comparative
Anonymous 1997 Review
Anonymous 1998 No safety data
Anonymous 1999 Review
Aozasa 1982 Not MMR vaccine
Asaria 2008 Review
Autret 1996 Epidemiological survey comparing onset of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura following vaccination with MMR compared to M, M, and R
Bakker 2001 Authors attribute school mumps outbreak to bad attenuated MMR vaccine lots; uncertain data about relationship between MMR exposure and symptom onset.
Balraj 1995 Review on mumps vaccine
Bawankule 2017 Vaccine type used not described.
Beck 1991 Assessed safety of MMR vaccination in children allergic to eggs
Bedford 2010 Editorial
Beeler 1996 Case series. Reported data were insufficient to assess causal relationship.
Benjamin 1991 Review
Berger 1988a Serological data only
Berger 1988b Serological data only
Berlin 1983 Surveillance data
Bernsen 2008 No review‐relevant outcomes reported. Study assessed association between MMR infection and atopic disorder.
Bhargava 1995 Non‐comparative
Bonanni 2005 Non‐comparative
Borchardt 2007 Non‐comparative
Borgono 1973 Non‐comparative
Boxall 2008 Non‐comparative
Brockhoff 2010 Non‐comparative
Brond 2017 Monovalent varicella vaccine
Bruno 1997 Compared 2 MMR types
Bulik 2018 Review
Buntain 1976 Case report
Buynak 1969 Non‐comparative
Byberg 2017 Monovalent varicella vaccine
Cao 2018 Vaccine type used is unclear; probably monovalent varicella.
Cardenosa 2006 Non‐comparative
Cashman 2018 Letter
Chang 1982 Serological data only
Chang 2017 Serological data only
Chen 1991 Participants aged over 15 years
Chen 2000 Review
Cherian 2010 Environmental factors associated to incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus only reported.
Chiodo 1992 Non‐comparative
Cinquetti 1994 Compared 2 types of MMR
Contardi 1989 Non‐comparative
Contardi 1992 Non‐comparative
Coplan 2000 Non‐comparative
Coronado 2006 Case‐fatality rate study
Cox 2009 Letter
Curtale 2010 Non‐comparative
Czajka 2009 Non‐comparative
D'Souza 2000 Non‐comparative
Dales 2001 Non‐comparative
Dallaire 2009 Non‐comparative
Dankova 1995 Serological study
Dashefsky 1990 MMR not given independently.
Davis 1997 MMR not given independently.
Dayan 2008a Non‐comparative
Deforest 1986 MMR given with DTP and OPV in different schedules.
Deforest 1988 DTP/OPV +/‐ MMR versus placebo or without MMR
De Laval 2010 Seroprevalence study
DeStefano 2000 Duplicate data of db‐Taylor 1999]
Diaz‐Ortega 2010 Non‐comparative
Dobrosavljevic 1999 Case report
Dominguez 2008 Surveillance study
Doshi 2009 Effectiveness of measles‐containing vaccines was assessed, not MMR specifically.
Dos Santos 2002 Non‐comparative
Duderstadt 2012 Participants' ages (17 to 35 years) did not meet study inclusion criteria (6 months to 15 years).
Dyer 2010a Commentary
Dyer 2010b Commentary
Elphinstone 2000 No data
Englund 1989 MMR not given independently.
Fitzpatrick 2007 Commentary
Fletcher 2001 Commentary
Garrido Lestache 1992 Non‐comparative
Geier 2004 Uncertain MMR focus, mixed with thimerosal
Gerber 2009 Review
Goodson 2010 Monovalent measles vaccine
Griffin 1991 Non‐comparative
Grilli 1992 Comparison of different types of measles in MMR
Hasrina 2017 Poster. No effectiveness or safety data
Hilton 2009 Content analysis
Hindiyeh 2009 No outcomes of interest. The study reported on serological data.
Höhle 2011 Monovalent varicella vaccine only
Hooker 2014 Retracted publication
Hornig 2008 Participants affected by gastrointestinal disturbance.
Hu 2007 Non‐comparative
Hua 2009 Association with Kawasaki disease. Tested for vaccines other than MMR
Huang 1990 Serological data only
Huang 2009 Case‐control study. Study of risk factors for mumps; does not provide effectiveness or safety data for mumps vaccination
Ipp 2003 Head‐to‐head study of 2 MMR types
Jiang 2009 Non‐comparative
Jones 1991 Non‐comparative
Just 1985 Comparison of different types of MMR; CCT with serological outcomes
Just 1986 Compared MMR +/‐ varicella vaccine
Just 1987a Compared MMR +/‐ OPV
Just 1987b Compared MMR +/‐ DTP
Kaaber 1990 Compared MMR with or without other vaccine versus other vaccines (DTP and OPV)
Karim 2002 Case report
Kaye 2001 Non‐comparative
Kazarian 1978 Case report
Khalil 2005 Cross‐sectional study
Kiepiela 1991 RCT investigating 2 types of measles vaccine
Kulkarni 2005 Review
Kurtzke 1997 Case‐control of exposure to anything/measles vaccine and multiple sclerosis
Kutty 2014 Economic evaluation
Latasa 2019 Insufficient information: epidemiological study of mumps incidence
Lee 1998 Commentary
Lee 2007 Non‐comparative
Lucena 2002 No comparator
Maekawa 1991 Non‐comparative
Maguire 1991 Non‐comparative
Majwala 2018 Measles vaccine type not specified
Mantadakis 2010 Review
Marshall 2016 Head‐to‐head study of 2 MMRVs
Matter 1995 Non‐comparative
Matter 1997 Serological data only
Meissner 2004 Review
Miller 1983 Non‐comparative; egg allergy
Miller 1993 Non‐comparative
Min 1991 Compared 2 MMR types
Minekawa 1974 Non‐comparative
Mommers 2004 MMR and all other childhood vaccines, indistinguishable comparison
Mupere 2006 MMR vaccine not included.
Nalin 1999 Serological data only
Narwaney 2017 Non‐comparative
Nicoll 1998 Commentary
Ntshoe 2013 Vaccine type not reported.
O'Brien 1998 Letter
O'Connor 2019 Insufficient information to assess vaccine efficacy; there were no unvaccinated children in the group
Ong 2006 Review
Patja 2000 Non‐comparative
Patja 2001 Non‐comparative
Pekmezovic 2004 MMR not included.
Peltola 1998 Non‐comparative case series
Peltola 2007 Review
Petridou 1997 Case‐control investigation that included all 153 incident cases of leukaemia ascertained throughout the country during 1993 and 1994, and 2 hospital controls for every case matched for gender, age, and place of residence. Data on MMR vaccination are presented as "total viral vaccination shots" (measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B vaccines; each antigen counted as a distinct shot).
Puvvada 1993 Non‐comparative case series
Rajantie 2007 Non‐comparative. Unclear study design
Roost 2004 Cross‐sectional study
Sabra 1998 Commentary
Saraswathy 2009 Serological data only
Scarpa 1990 Non‐comparative
Schaffzin 2007 Differences between 2 subpopulations in the study were not taken into account. Partially outside age parameters for this review. Effectiveness was calculated cumulatively for campers (N = 368, age 7 to 15 years, mean 12 years, 366/368 previously immunised with 2 doses of mumps‐containing vaccine, only 2/368 with 1 dose) and staff members (N = 139, age 14 to 65 years, mean 21 years, of whom 74, 44, and 21 received respectively 2, 1, and no doses of a mumps‐containing vaccine).
Schettini 1989 Serological data only
Schettini 1990 Non‐comparative
Schmid 2008 Non‐comparative
Schultz 2008 Assessed a possible relationship between paracetamol and autism. Data were obtained via a parent survey; methods and results are questionable.
Schwarz 2010 No treatment: measles + MMR vaccine
Schwarzer 1998 Compared 2 types of MMR
Seagroatt 2003 Measles vaccine type was unclear.
Shah 2017 Serological data only
Shah 2018 Insufficient information to detect efficacy of the third dose of the MMR vaccine
Sharma 2004 Non‐comparative
Shinefield 2002 MMR not given independently.
So 2008 Korean language, abstract only in English
Spitzer 2001 Commentary
Stetler 1985 DTP vaccine
Stokes 1967 Serological data only
Stratton 1994 Review
Sugiura 1982 Serological data only
Svanström 2010 Non‐comparative
Tosun 2017 Monovalent measles vaccine
Ueda 1995 Compared 2 types of MMR
Vesikari 1979 The study is written in Finnish, and reports on few epidemiological data not suitable for the objective of this review.
Vesikari 1984 Compared 2 types of MMR
Wakefield 1998 Retracted publication
Wakefield 1999a Non‐comparative
Wakefield 1999b No data
Wakefield 2000 Non‐comparative
Walker 2011 Non‐comparative
Willocks 2017 Non‐comparative
Wilson 2003 Systematic review
Wilson 2011 Hospitalisation without specific definition made this endpoint too generic, therefore the study did not provide useful information on vaccine effectiveness or safety.
Woyciechowska 1985 Not MMR
Yamashiro 1998 Paricipants' ages did not meet review inclusion criteria.
Yu 2007 Non‐comparative

CCT: controlled clinical trial
DTP: diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccine
MMR: measles, mumps, rubella vaccine
MMRV: measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine
OPV: trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine
RCT: randomised controlled trial