Table 3.
Frequency of children with CdLS, FXS and RTS who fit the original Guttman sequence
| Sequence | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Other patterns | N | N fit scale exactly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helping | – | + | + | + | + | |||
| Re-enactment of intended acts or Communication: Point | – | – | + | + | + | |||
| Communication: Gaze OR Cooperation: Tubes | – | – | – | + | + | |||
| Cooperation: Trampoline | – | – | – | – | + | |||
| Syndrome | ||||||||
| CdLS | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 16 (73%) |
| FXS | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 14 (74%) |
| RTS | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 14 (78%) |
| AUT* | 3 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 19 (90%) |
| TD* | 4 | 7 | 19 | 29 | 14 | 13 | 86 | 73 (85%) |
A plus sign indicates that a child passed a task, whereas a minus sign indicates that a child failed a task
*As reported in Ellis et al. [27]