Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;21:1175. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06887-x

Table 2.

Patterns of resistance to first and second line antituberculosis drug in Western Kenya

Item HIV negative TB patients (N = 286) HIV positive TB patients (N = 267) Total (N = 553)
No % 95% CI No % 95% CI No % 95% CI
No. sensitive to all 164 57.3 51.7–63.3 125 46.8 40.4–53.9 286 51.7 47.7–56.1
Drug resistant strains 122 42.7 36.7–48.3 142 53.2 46.1–59.6 267 48.3 43.9–52.3
Any resistance
 Isoniazid (H) 81 28.5 23–34 63 23.6 18.4–29.2 144 26 22.6–29.5
 Rifampicin (R) 47 16.4 12–20.7 39 14.6 10.1–19.1 86 15.6 12.6–19
 Ethambutol (E) 13 4.5 2.1–7.0 15 5.6 3.0–8.7 28 5.1 3.3–6.7
 Streptomycin (S) 12 4.2 2.1–6.6 6 2.2 0.7–4.1 18 3.3 2.0–4.9
 Pyrazinamide 5 1.7 0.3–3.5 7 2.6 0.7–4.5 12 2.2 1.1–3.5
 Ethionamide 1 0.3 0.0–1.4 0 0 – 1 0.2 0.0–0.5
 Gatifloxacin 1 0.3 0.0–1.0 0 0 – 1 0.2 0.0–0.5
 Amikacin 1 0.3 0.0–1.0 0 0 – 1 0.2 0.0–0.5
 Capreomycin 1 0.3 0.0–1.0 0 0 – 1 0.2 0.0–0.5
Mono-resistant TB
 Isoniazid (H) 52 18.2 14.3–22.7 34 12.7 6–12.4 86 15.6 12.7–18.7
 Rifampicin (R) 27 9.4 5.6–12.9 24 9.0 9–16.5 51 9.2 6.9–11.8
 Ethambutol (E) 3 1.0 0.0–2.4 7 2.6 0.4–4.9 10 1.8 0.7–2.9
 Streptomycin (S) 9 3.1 1.4–5.3 5 1.9 0.4–3.7 14 2.5 1.4–4.0
 Pyrazinamide 9 3.1 1.0–5.6 5 1.9 0.4–3.7 14 2.5 1.3–4.0
Multidrug resistant TB (MDR-TB)
 H + R 16 5.6 3.1–8.1 17 6.4 3.4–9.7 33 6 4.2–8.1
 H + R + E 12 4.2 2.1–6.6 13 4.9 2.2–7.5 25 4.5 2.9–6.5
 H + R + S 3 1.0 0.0–2.1 0 0 – 3 0.5 0.0–1.3
 H + R + E + S 0 – 2 0.7 0.0–1.9 2 0.4 0.0–0.9
Polyresistance
 R + PZA 3 1 0.0–2.1 3 1.1 0.0–2.6 6 1.1 0.4–2.0
 R + Amk 2 0.7 0.0–1.7 – – – 2 0.4 0.0–0.9
 H + PZA 3 1 0.0–2.4 – – – 3 0.5 0.0–1.3
 H + Gfx 2 0.7 0.0–1.7 3 1.1 0.0–2.6 5 0.9 0.0–1.3
 H + Eto 2 0.7 0.0–1.7 1 0.4 0.0–1.5 3 0.5 0.0–1.1
 STY + Eto 1 1 0.0–1.4 – – – 1 0.2 0.0–0.7
 ETH + Eto 3 1 0.0–2.4 – – – 3 0.5 0.0–1.3
 ETH + PZA 2 0.7 0.0–1.7 – – – 2 0.4 0.0–0.9
 H + Kn 2 0.7 0.0–1.7 1 0.4 0.0–1.1 3 0.5 0.0–1.3
 H + Cm 1 0.3 0.0–1.0 – – – 1 0.2 0.0–0.7
 H + Amk – – – 3 1.1 0.0–2.6 3 0.5 0.0–1.3